Background: Poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy is a barrier to
effective asthma management and a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Attempts to improve
adherence have had a little measurable effect due to difficulty in accurately measuring adherence
and the complex nature of non-adherence. Electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) have been used
in research to objectively monitor inhaler actuation; however, data on the effectiveness of EMDs
in the clinical setting are sparse.
Objective: This article reviews published, controlled studies employing EMDs as part of an
intervention aimed at optimizing adherence in asthma and attempting to influence clinical
Method: Ovid Medline, Scopus and Web of Science were searched (July 2017) for studies using
keywords related to asthma, inhaler technology, electronic monitoring and adherence. Data
regarding study design, adherence and clinical outcomes were extracted.
Results: Ten published studies representing 1469 randomised participants are included in this
review. All but one study reported a significant difference in adherence between intervention and
control groups; however, only two studies, both in children, were able to report sustained,
significant improvements in clinical outcomes: one in asthma morbidity score and another in
asthma-related oral corticosteroid use and hospital admissions.
Conclusion: EMDs show improvements in adherence, there is little current evidence to support
that they reduce morbidity. Evidence of clinical effectiveness is needed to justify their common
use in clinical practice and maximise their potential benefit. Carefully considered study design
will be integral to demonstrating such clinical effectiveness.
Keywords: asthma, control, electronic monitoring, adherence, compliance, m-health
Rights & PermissionsPrintExport