Quality of Life and Social Support in Women with Urinary Incontinence

Author(s): Marta Makara-Studzińska, Agata Madej, Elżbieta Trypka, Jerzy Leszek, Vadim V. Tarasov, Ghulam M. Ashraf, Nagendra Sastry Yarla, Anna N. Samsonova, Gjumrakch Aliev*.

Journal Name: Current Women`s Health Reviews

Volume 15 , Issue 2 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Abstract:

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a serious medical and social problem for about one-third of women in the world population. It is one of the most common chronic diseases of women. Despite significant improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of this illness, women continue to struggle with the stigma associated with incontinence. Research conducted in the last few years shows the importance of social support in respect of the illness.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine how people perceive the disease and the influence of social support to deal with UI.

Materials and Methods: The study involved 200 women in the age range of 34-78 with a diagnosis of incontinence. All women agreed to fill out an anonymous questionnaire, Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) and Disease-Related Social Support Scale (DSRSS). The obtained results were subject to statistical analysis.

Results: The greater the social support, the lesser the tendencies to judge the condition in terms of harm. Material support among respondents makes it easier for them to distance themselves from UI. Women having a sense of spiritual, emotional, and global support information found it easier to come in terms with UI.

Conclusion: There is a relationship between the perception of disease for women, and social support received by women. Awareness of the availability support in disease allows peaceful thinking about a situation as difficult as UI.

Keywords: Aging women, overactive bladder, quality of life, social support, urinary incontinence, the acceptance of disease.

[1]
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003; 61(1): 37-49.
[2]
Weber-Rajek M, Bułatowicz I, Radzimińska A, Strojek K, Goch A, Żukow W. Evaluation of the efficacy of physical methods in the treatment of urinary incontinence in women - a review of research. J Educ Health Sport 2015; 5(3): 11-34.
[3]
Kwaśna K, Chmielewska D, Piecha M, et al. Physiotherapy treatment of urinary stress incontinence in women. Part 2. Menopause Rev 2012; 11(5): 372-5.
[4]
Derewiecki T, Mroczek M, Majcher P, Chruściel P. Importance of urinary incontinence problems among women over 40 years of age. Hygeia Public Heath 2015; 50(1): 219-25.
[5]
Klisowska I, Dąbek A, Zborowska I, Kapakowski B, Kowalik M. Urinary incontinence - task for the physiotherapist. Part II. Piel Zdr Publ 2012; 2(2): 145-52.
[6]
Surkont G, Wlaźlak E, Suzin J. Urinary incontinence in women - social, medical and scientific problem. Przegląd Menopauzalny 2003; 1: 59-65.
[7]
Adamczuk J, Kraczkowski JJ, Robak JM, et al. Stress Urinary Incontinence as a civilization disease? Prob Hig Epidemiol 2011; 92(3): 382-6.
[8]
Dutkiewicz S, Kapusta K. Risk factors and quality of life in urinary incontinence females in the Care and Medical Centre in Kielce. Przegląd Menopauzalny 2011; 6: 493-9.
[9]
Miękoś E, Sosnowski M, Zydek C. Risk factory and prevention of urinary incontinence in women. Przegląd Menopauzalny 2004; 5: 43-9.
[10]
Adamczuk J, Kraczkowski JJ, Robak JM, Żurawska vel Dziurawiec K. Expectations of the midwife’s role in women with stress urinary incontinence. Prob Hig Epidemiol 2011; 92(3): 675-8.
[11]
Hart ML, Izeta A, Herdera-Imbroda B, Amend B, Brinchmann JE. Cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2015; 21(4): 365-76.
[12]
Rincón Ardila O. Prevalence and risk factors for urinary incontinence among young women consulting in primary care. Rev Med Chil 2015; 143(2): 203-12.
[13]
Iwanowicz-Palus G, Stadnicka G, Włoszczak-Szubzda A. Medical and psychosocial factors conditioning development of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Ann Agric Environ Med 2013; 20: 135-9.
[14]
Chmielewska DD, Piecha M, Kwaśna K, Błaszczak E, Taradaj J, Skrzypulec-Plinta V. Urinary incontinence: A problem of the modern woman. Przegląd Menopauzalny 2013; 5: 378-84.
[15]
Steuden S, Janowski K, Eds. Psychosocial aspects of the experience of loss. Wydawnictwo KUL: Lublin 2009.
[16]
Janowski K, Gierus J, Eds. Sick man- biopsychosocial aspects.Part 1 Lublin. 2009.
[17]
Janowski K, Artymiak M, Eds. Sick man- biopsychosocial aspects.Part 1 Lublin. 2009.
[18]
Wysocka-Pleczyk M. Online support groups as a new form of assistance in coping with disease. Hygeia Public Health 2012; 47(4): 391-7.
[19]
Meyer TJ, Mark MM. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol 1995; 14(2): 101-8.
[20]
Luecken LJ, Compas BE. Stress, coping and immune function in breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 2002; 24(4): 336-44.
[21]
Sęk H, Cieślak R, Eds. Social support, stress and health. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warsaw 2005.
[22]
Janowski K, Steuden S. Scale acceptance of disease. Wydawnictwo KUL: Lublin 2007.
[23]
Brachowicz M. Psychological conditions of coping with stress of infertility Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation Katedra Psychologii Klinicznej, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Lublin 2008.
[24]
MacLachlan LS, Rovner ES. New Treatments for Incontinence. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2015; 22(4): 279-88.
[25]
Derewiecki T, Duda M, Majcher P, Mroczek K. The women’s knowledge about the urinary incontinence and ways of controlling the illness. Polish J Public Health 2012; 122(3): 269-73.
[26]
Bugajska B. Support the old man in the local environment.Żółkowska T. (eds.) In: Special Education– Achievements to Data and Challenges. Wydawnictwo Oficyna INPULS: Szczecin 2005.
[27]
Stadnicka G, Janik M, Łepecka-Klusek C, Pilewska-Kozak A. Psycho-social consequences of incontinenceMedycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu 2014; 20(2): 136-40.
[28]
Bielicki K, Cisło M, Kaim K, Szpyrko A, Świdrak W. Evaluation of urinary incontinence in women on the basis of gynecological examination and questionnaire developedMateriały JubileuszowegoSympozjum 50-lecia I Katedry i Kliniki Położnictwa i I Katedry i Klinki Ginekologii 1946-1996, Wrocław. 1996; pp. 281-6.
[29]
Lee KS, Choo MS, Seo JT, et al. Impact of overactive bladder on quality of life and resorce use: Results from Korean Burden of Incontinence Study (KOBIS). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015; 1391: 89.
[30]
Senra C, Pereira MG. Quality of life in women with urinary incontinence. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2015; 61(2): 178-83.
[31]
Amaral MO, Countinho EC, Nelas PA, Chaves CMB, Duarte JC. Risk factors associated with urinary incontinence in Portugal and the quality of life of affected women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131(1): 82-6.
[32]
Mishra GD, Barker MS, Herber-Gast GC, Hillard T. Depression and the incidence of urinary incontinence symptoms among young women: Results from a prospective cohort study. Maturitas 2015; 81(4): 456-61.
[33]
Ghafouri A, Alnaimi AR, Alhothi HM, et al. Urinary incontinence in Qatar: A study of the prevalence, risk factors and impact on quality of life. Arab J Urol 2014; 12(4): 269-74.


Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

VOLUME: 15
ISSUE: 2
Year: 2019
Page: [123 - 129]
Pages: 7
DOI: 10.2174/1573404814666180125160956
Price: $58

Article Metrics

PDF: 19
HTML: 1