Impact of Minimal Processing on the Quality of the Sweet Celebration Grape Cultivar

Author(s): Bruna R. Pereira, Antonio G. Soares*, Henriqueta T.G. Barboza, Regina C.C. Coneglian, Marco A. da Silva Vasconcellos, Marcos J. de Oliveira Fonseca.

Journal Name: Current Nutrition & Food Science

Volume 15 , Issue 3 , 2019

Become EABM
Become Reviewer

Graphical Abstract:


Background: Nowadays, the producers have great interest on the apirenic grapes cultivars due to acceptance by all markets, besides the adding value to the product. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of minimally processed seedless grapes of the Sweet Celebration cultivar using three different solutions for the final wash of the berries and the removal or not of the peduncle were evaluated during twelve days stored at 8°C.

Methods: The ‘Sweet Celebration’ cultivar grapes were washed and selected. Then they were submitted to a pre-washing step in chlorine solution. The berries with and without peduncle were submitted to a final wash using three different solutions: potable water, sodium metabisulfite and chlorine dissolved in water at 4±1°C. The evaluations of the minimally processed grapes were performed at zero, three, six, nine and twelve days of storage.

Results: The firmness of the fruit was not affected by the solutions applied in the final wash. In general, berries without peduncle had higher cumulative weight loss, when compared to berries with peduncle, except for the sodium metabisulfite solution samples. The results suggest that water can be used for the final wash of the berries with peduncle as there was a lower weight loss of these fruits. The results with the other solutions applied and the sodium metabisulfite solution for the berries without peduncle were equivalent.

Conclusion: The findings recommend use water as final wash solution to maintaining fruit quality of Sweet Celebration’ cultivar grapes when the peduncle is not removed.

Keywords: Cold storage, fresh-cut, minimally processed, peduncle, seedless grape, shelf life.

Del Caro A, Piga A, Vacca V, Agabbio M. Changes of flavonoids, vitamin C and antioxidant capacity in minimally processed citrus segments and juices during storage. Food Chem 2004; 84(1): 99-105.
Bastos M do SR. Processamento mínimo de frutas Agricultura Familiar. Brasilia. 2006.
Pereira LM, Rodrigues ACC, Sarantópoulos CIG de L, Junqueira VCA, Cardello HMAB, Hubinger MD. Shelf life of minimally processed guavas stored in modified atmosphere packages. Ciênciae Tecnol Aliment 2003; 23(3): 427-33.
Mattiuz B-H, Miguel ACA, Nachtigal JC, Durigan JF, Camargo UA. Seedless table grapes minimally processed. Rev Bras Frutic 2004; 26(2): 226-9.
Srebernich SM. Using chlorine dioxide and peracetic acid as substitutes for sodium hypocloride in the sanitization of minimally processed green seasoning. Ciência e Tecnol Aliment 2007; 27(4): 744-50.
Chitarra MIF, Chitarra AB. Pós- colheita de frutas e hortaliças- Fisiologia e manejo 2. Lavras, MG;. 2005; p. 785.
Silva PPM da, Carmo LF do, Silva GM, Aoki PFS, Spoto MHF. Minimal processing of juçara’s heart palm packed in brine acidified. Semin Agrar 2012; 33(1): 219-26.
ISO. ISO 2173: Fruit and vegetables products: Determination of soluble solids content. In: International Organization For Standardization In: 2003.
ISO. ISO 750: Fruit and vegetable products. Determination of titratable acidity. In: International Organization For Standardization 1998.
Macrae R. Food science and technology: A series of monoghraphys: HPLC in food analysis 2nd ed. Press A: New York 1998; 77.
Mattiuz B, Carolina N, Miguel A, Galati VC, Nachtigal JC. Effect of stored temperature in minimally processed seedless table grapes. Rev Bras Frutic 2009; 31(1): 44-52.
Aguila S, Heiffig S, Ongarelli G, Alfredo R. Physical and anatomical characterization of mechanical injuries to banana fruit. Rev Iberoam Tecnol Postcosecha 2007; 8(2): 60-5.
Petri E, Arroqui C, Angós I, Vírseda P. Effect of preservative agents on the respiration rate of minimally processed potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. Monalisa). J Food Sci 2008; 73(3): 122-6.
Neto F, Olivier CGAB, Silva C. Postharvest: Biology and technology Avaliação pós-colheita de mamão variedade “Formosa” submetido a danos mecânicos e ensaios de compressão durante o armazenamento Evaluation of post-harvest variety papaya “Formosa” subjected to mechanical damage. 2013. 22(2): 5-10.
Azzolini M, Jacomino AP, Bron IU. Indices to evaluate postharvest quality of guavas under different maturation stages. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 2004; 39(2): 139-45.
Deng Y, Wu Y, Li Y. Changes in firmness, cell wall composition and cell wall hydrolases of grapes stored in high oxygen atmospheres. Food Res Int 2005; 38(7): 769-76.
Manica I, Pommer CV. Uva: Do plantio à produção, pós- colheita e mercado. Continentes C, Ed. Porto Alegre, RS;. 2006; p. 185.
Carreño I, Cabezas JA, Martínez-Mora C, et al. Quantitative genetic analysis of berry firmness in table grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Tree Genet Genomes 2015; 11(818): 1-10.
Neves LC, Bender RJ, Rombaldi CR, Vieites RL. Storage in passive modified atmosphere of “golden star” starfruit (Averrhoa carambola L.). 2004. 26(1): 13-6.
Gonçalves ED, Antunes PL, Brackmann A. Armazenamento da pera ‘Nijisseiki’, em atmosfera controlada. Rev Bras Frutic 2000; 22(2): 226-31.
Jeronimo RF, Kanesiro MAB. Efeito da associação de armazenamento sob refrigeração e atmosfera modificada na qualidade de mangas Palmer. Rev Bras Frutic 2000; 22(2): 237-43.
Vitti MCD, Kluge RA, Jacomino AP, Groppo VD, Moretti CL. Minimum processing of beet (Beta vulgaris). Report No. 23.Available from: amento-minimo-de-beterraba-beta-vulgaris/
Bernardes-silva APF, Lajolo FM, Cordenunsi BR. Evolution of starch and soluble sugar content during development and ripening of different mango cultivars. Ciência e Tecnol Aliment 2003; 23(Suppl. 1): 116-20.

Rights & PermissionsPrintExport Cite as

Article Details

Year: 2019
Page: [274 - 280]
Pages: 7
DOI: 10.2174/1573401313666170928145627
Price: $65

Article Metrics

PDF: 34
PRC: 1