Negotiation and Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

Fundamentals, Theories, Systems and Applications

Indexed in: EBSCO.

Agent technology has generated lots of excitement in the past decade. Currently, multi-agent systems (MAS) composed of autonomous agents representing individuals or organizations and capable of ...
[view complete introduction]

US $
15

*(Excluding Mailing and Handling)



Argumentation-Based Planning in Multi-Agent Systems

Pp. 361-398 (38)

Eva Onaindia, Oscar Sapena and Alejandro Torreno

Abstract

Research in Multi-Agent Planning (MAP) has traditionally been concerned with the design of coordination mechanisms such that the resulting joint plan meets the global goals of a problem. In contrast to most MAP techniques, in this paper we present a novel argumentation-based approach for multiple agents that plan cooperatively while having different capabilities, knowledge about the world and even contradictory information. Our aim is to enhance the role of argumentation as a means to attain a collective behaviour when devising a joint plan. Since agents’ decisions are influenced by the other agents’ plans, the use of mechanisms becomes relevant for persuading an agent to adopt a certain course of action, or negotiating on the use of scarce resources. Through a dialectical process, agents will discuss the different choices put forward by the others thus reaching a commonly agreed solution plan.

Keywords:

Multi-agent Systems, Argumentation, Planning, Multi-agent Planning, Coordination, Argument schemes, Dialectical trees, Intelligent Agents, Computational Argumentation, Argumentation-based Negotiation.

Affiliation:

Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46011 Valencia, Spain