Background: The evolution of society towards greater individual freedom, autonomy and questioning of
authority is altering the ways in which psychopathology is expressed, and demands a new understanding of psychopathology.
As a result of the liberalization of society, there has been an evolution of psychopathology from a pathology of
conflict fostered by a repressive society towards a pathology of interpersonal relationships, limits, and dependency.
Methods: This article explains how problems formerly viewed as related to aggressive or sexual impulses can now only be
envisaged dialectically alongside the issues of identity, limits, and fears of engulfment or of abandonment by persons of
trust. Narcissistic injury, and the impact of insecure relationships in early life occupy a central position in the understanding
of these pathologies.
Conclusions: The capacity for self-awareness has led human beings towards an exponentially increased creative potential,
but also towards boundless destructiveness. Both appear as a form of reaction in the face of a threatened territory and humiliated
narcissism. Rather than the person's impulses, it is the biological emotional particularities of each person, and the
quality of his or her internal security and narcissistic foundation that will determine that person's ability for containment,
and the balance of his personality, in a process of constant exchange and co-construction with those around him. Adolescence
is a particularly crucial period for the expression of these issues. The weight of constraints, whether biological or
social, make the self and the familial and environmental setting central in their management. The person's ability to cope,
or conversely his or her liability to be engulfed by trauma, are essential determinants of the prognosis.